🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since those days, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A drive to remove the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a professor at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for people, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.